Next week voters will take a vote to decide if the U.K. should leave the European Union. The opinion polls show a very close vote, with a slight edge to the “leave” campaign. But whatever happens next week, the fact that Brexit is being considered seriously means that people’s views have hardened.
The government decided to ask British voters — “Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?”
When I wrote about this in my Weekend Note on April 15 2016 it seemed that British people are most upset about immigration policies. As well, the cost of Brussels bureaucracy and complicated EU rules are irritants for the “leave” camp. Here’s an example of views about immigration, from Time Magazine on December 16, 2015:
Source: TIme Magazine
The “leave” vote is heavily supported by people over 65 years of age.
Source: British Social Attitudes Study
Stories like this from The Sun in London fuel the flames:
Source: The Sun, News UK Co.
A victory for the Brexit camp might win relief from waves of immigrants swamping Britain’s public services and taking jobs but the overall economic impact would be negative. Since services that London provides to the EU, mostly in the highly paid financial sector, would be relocated to the Continent in a full rupture of the relationship, the benefit of Brexit would accrue to France and Germany and the loss would be Britain’s to bear.
A “leave” vote and the ensuing negotiations would hurt the U.K. economy in other ways. The U.K. is in the middle of a housing bubble and a related household debt bubble. A withdrawal of people working in the London banking sector would mean a major loss for the City of London and weak prices for luxury homes.
But the surprisingly large faction that wishes to leave the EU is upset about more than immigration. Their concern shows that the winds are blowing in the direction of change. Motivated by ill-defined feelings of dissatisfaction and malaise voters everywhere are angry. A referendum is a perfect opportunity to express discontent without the restraints of political party tradition. In the U.S. some voters are backing Trump for similar reasons. But the parallel with Trump’s support isn’t perfect since many of Britain’s elite, including London Mayor, Boris Johnson, support Brexit.
While the push for Brexit might have been mostly about immigration six months ago, it has now morphed into a referendum on everything that bothers people. The Conservative Party, led by Cameron, should be worried about the next election, expected in about three years. A far-left government of Labour under Corbyn or a centre-left coalition seems very likely.
In a very sad twist the murder of Pro-EU Member of Parliament Jo Cox, by an alleged “Britain First” extremist, means that more extreme elements of the “leave” camp were silenced, at least for a few days. A special session of British Parliament slated for Monday will extend that period of restraint as people are reminded of her campaign against the spread of hatred. Opposition Leader Corbyn said, “The well of hatred killed her.”
U.K. residents will be the big losers if the vote to leave wins. The European experiment will survive the loss of Britain, as the EU’s economy has more to gain. EU authorities will make a public show of punishing Britain during the negotiations following a “leave” vote, to make an example to others who might be thinking of doing the same.
In the markets expect a strong rally in the British pound if the “remain” camp wins, and continued strength in the price of gold if the “leave” vote prevails.
Hilliard, The MacBeth Group team and their clients may trade in securities mentioned in this blog.
The opinions expressed in this report are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Richardson GMP Limited or its affiliates. Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute the author's judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. We do not warrant the completeness or accuracy of this material, and it should not be relied upon as such. Before acting on any recommendation, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The comments contained herein are general in nature and are not intended to be, nor should be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular individual. Accordingly, individuals should consult their own legal or tax advisors for advice with respect to the tax consequences to them, having regard to their own particular circumstances.. Richardson GMP Limited is a member of Canadian Investor Protection Fund. Richardson is a trade-mark of James Richardson & Sons, Limited. GMP is a registered trade-mark of GMP Securities L.P. Both used under license by Richardson GMP Limited.